![f1 2018 usa setup f1 2018 usa setup](https://simracingsetup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/F1-2020-Game.jpg)
![f1 2018 usa setup f1 2018 usa setup](https://cdn.realsport101.com/images/ncavvykf/realsport-production/4105d43c09f6a1928c7f31d769ba1e37e67b3a12-1280x720.jpg)
It carried relatively less downforce compared to the high load profiles used by everyone. Clearly this is not very noticeable because for months now Seb has been living in traffic, as if he were driving on the ring road.įew people have noticed a new front wing introduced in Portugal. This in the race usually allows him a good management of tyres on rear limited tracks unlike Portimao.
F1 2018 usa setup driver#
The Monégasque driver manages it in a more productive manner, while his teammate, on the contrary, struggles with the innate and inherited instability on the SF1000, settling for more prudent driving. What differs between them are specific settings in relation to the turbocharger, which is much more aggressive for Charles Leclerc. Then it might as well be that maybe, behind closed doors, they both weight each other’s words very carefully.įrom what I know the cars are the same. Mattia Binotto, beyond the controversy over the “second driver”*, makes it clear that the cars are identical, and that it’s important that Vettel doesn’t doubt that. Charles isĬertainly doing a great job, but more is expected of our second Skills are unquestionable, he just needs to be able to start furtherĪhead on the grid in order to be able to demonstrate them. I hope that Vettel can qualify better at Imola. Improve what they can, but at that point all the adjustments have to be They need a lot of time, data and working hours to try and Ferrari then enters a vicious cycle, aĭark tunnel. Take a look at the 2020/2019 backtrain,Īnd you’ll notice for yourself. Let’s remember that at the time the project was ultimated (preĬovid-19, a different time, a different world), Seb hadn’t beenĭiscarded at all and his performance still mattered to the team… andĭue to what we all know happened after the new FIA directives,įerrari found themselves with half their horsepower and consequently We then come to the SF1000, designed along the lines of the SF90, but On the 2018 Ferrari, at aĬertain point, the thread of development on the rear end was lost, withĪn incalculable number of attempts, discarded and then re-proposedįloors, none of which gave the rear the extra stability Vettel demanded. In the car, confirming it, beyond the final result, in the race in Sochi Victory of Ferrari and Sebastian in F1 so far. (it seems absurd) of what happened last year, coinciding with the last Longer worked for the German from Singapore onwards. In some ways the updates on the SF71-H no Is a consquence of what happened with the SF90, and born of that “after Want to take it too far, on the other hand what we see today, this year, Or rather demonstrated, much more consistency than the German. Raikkonen, coming out of Maranello, during the last season’s GPs seemed, Probably as early as the second half of 2018 with the SF71-H theĭevelopment direction moved away from his comfort zone. Sebastian is not that different of a driver than he was in 2017 orĢ013, just to mention two years when he was perfect behind the wheel.